Private Internet Access
- No-logs Policy
- Simultaneous Connections
- Open Source Apps
Private Internet Access is a US-based VPN that had no user logs to hand over in three court cases. Deloitte audited it in 2025. Suits budget power users.
This comparison sets PIA's court-tested transparency against ExpressVPN's premium polish and strength in streaming. PIA's reputation comes from multiple legal victories that proved its no-logs policy. ExpressVPN has…
Private Internet Access is a US-based VPN that had no user logs to hand over in three court cases. Deloitte audited it in 2025. Suits budget power users.
A premium-priced VPN based in the British Virgin Islands, with RAM-only servers and a no-logs policy audited 23 times. It suits travelers and journalists.
This comparison sets PIA's court-tested transparency against ExpressVPN's premium polish and strength in streaming. PIA's reputation comes from multiple legal victories that proved its no-logs policy. ExpressVPN has refined a premium product that performs consistently whatever you use it for.
PIA is well ahead on legal transparency. Its no-logs policy has been tested in court multiple times and was confirmed each time. ExpressVPN is trustworthy but hasn't faced the same scrutiny. It uses TrustedServer technology with RAM-only servers. PIA gives you granular control over encryption levels, protocols and connection settings. ExpressVPN puts ease of use first.
PIA operates over 35,000 servers against ExpressVPN's 3,000+. For streaming, though, server quality often counts for more than numbers. ExpressVPN is clearly better at streaming, with dedicated infrastructure and SmartPlay technology. PIA has improved a lot but is still less consistent.
On long-term plans PIA costs roughly 1/3 as much as ExpressVPN, which makes it very good value for technically inclined users. Support follows the same split. ExpressVPN offers premium 24/7 assistance. PIA's technical support assumes you know what you're doing.
| Feature | Private Internet Access | Express VPN |
|---|---|---|
Ad & Tracker Blocking | ||
Anonymous Payment Methods | ||
Connection Protocols | ||
Custom VPN Protocols | ||
Customer Support Availability | ||
Dedicated IP Option | ||
Encryption Standard | ||
Independent Audits | ||
IPv6 Leak Protection | ||
Kill Switch | ||
Multi-Hop | ||
No-logs Policy | ||
Open Source Apps | ||
RAM-only Servers | ||
Simultaneous Connections | ||
Split Tunneling | ||
Streaming Support | ||
Support Channels | ||
Torrenting Support |
Your technical skill and priorities should settle this. Choose PIA if you're technically inclined and want court-tested transparency with maximum customization. You give up some polish and pay far less. Choose ExpressVPN if you need guaranteed streaming performance and plug-and-play apps. Expect to pay premium prices for that consistency. For power users and privacy advocates, PIA offers more transparency and control for much less money.

Remote work is the dream for many professionals: pajamas all day and zero morning traffic. It also puts your online privacy and data security at risk.

Depending on where you are, some parts of the internet are off-limits. Virtual Private Networks (VPNs) get around those blocks. Using one is legal in most countries, with a few notable exceptions.

A VPN protects you on public Wi-Fi and lets you reach content from other countries. It also keeps your browsing habits private (*no judgment here*).
A mainstream VPN with a no-logs policy audited five times and bundled security extras. It suits households with several devices and frequent travelers.
Surfshark is a lower-priced VPN with unlimited device connections and a no-logs policy verified twice by Deloitte. It suits households with many devices.
ProtonVPN is a Swiss VPN from the Proton Mail team with open-source apps and a free tier that has no data cap or ads. It suits privacy-first users.
Detailed feature analysis, performance benchmarks, and pricing comparison
Security protocols, server networks, and streaming capabilities compared
Speed tests, privacy policies, and user experience evaluation