Mullvad and Hide.me take very different approaches to running a VPN and to signing up new users. Mullvad is a privacy-first cooperative with uncompromising principles. Hide.me is built around a free tier and plenty of…
Swedish VPN that signs you up with a random account number and charges a flat 5 euros a month. Suits privacy-first users who can live without streaming.
Malaysia-based VPN supporting WireGuard, OpenVPN, IKEv2, SSTP and SoftEther. Suits technical users who value protocol choice over reliable streaming.
Mullvad and Hide.me take very different approaches to running a VPN and to signing up new users. Mullvad is a privacy-first cooperative with uncompromising principles. Hide.me is built around a free tier and plenty of technical customization.
Only Hide.me has a free plan, which gives you 10GB of data a month and access to 5 server locations. Mullvad has no free tier, but its pricing is consistent and ethical: €5/month for everyone. Their privacy approaches could hardly be further apart. Mullvad accepts anonymous cash payments and identifies you by a random account number, while Hide.me uses conventional account management.
Hide.me offers detailed protocol customization and stealth options. Mullvad concentrates on the WireGuard protocol and an architecture designed with privacy first. Mullvad is completely transparent and runs its operations ethically. Hide.me is a traditional tech company with a free tier to draw people in.
Neither is strong at geo-unblocking for streaming, though Hide.me has made more effort in this area. Hide.me's apps are easier to pick up and give you more to customize. Mullvad's simple, privacy-focused approach requires more commitment from you.
The value on offer differs a lot. Mullvad is about maximum privacy and ethical transparency. Hide.me lets you try the service before you buy.
| Feature | Mullvad | Hide.me |
|---|---|---|
Ad & Tracker Blocking | ||
Anonymous Payment Methods | ||
Connection Protocols | ||
Custom VPN Protocols | ||
Customer Support Availability | ||
Dedicated IP Option | ||
Encryption Standard | ||
Independent Audits | ||
IPv6 Leak Protection | ||
Kill Switch | ||
Multi-Hop | ||
No-logs Policy | ||
Open Source Apps | ||
RAM-only Servers | ||
Simultaneous Connections | ||
Split Tunneling | ||
Streaming Support | ||
Support Channels | ||
Torrenting Support |
Your privacy priorities and your budget settle this. Choose Mullvad if privacy matters more to you than anything else. It fits people who value complete transparency and anonymous payment options and would rather support ethical business practices than get a free tier. Go with Hide.me if you want to try before you buy with its generous free tier. It also suits you if you like technical customization and flexible pricing options. For privacy purists, Mullvad holds itself to the higher ethical standard. For budget-conscious users still exploring VPNs, Hide.me is easier to get into.
Like a seatbelt, a VPN is easy to forget until you need it. A few quick changes in your VPN app help you avoid the biggest mistakes and make your browsing more private and faster.
Sarah Mitchell
Telling the truth can be dangerous. Journalists and activists use VPNs to get around censorship and hide where they are connecting from.
David Chen
Yes, VPNs are legal in India. Learn the caveats of CERT-In's logging order and how to choose a safe provider for privacy, streaming and compliance in 2025.
David Chen
A mainstream VPN with a no-logs policy audited five times and bundled security extras. It suits households with several devices and frequent travelers.
Surfshark is a lower-priced VPN with unlimited device connections and a no-logs policy verified twice by Deloitte. It suits households with many devices.
ProtonVPN is a Swiss VPN from the Proton Mail team with open-source apps and a free tier that has no data cap or ads. It suits privacy-first users.
Detailed feature analysis, performance benchmarks, and pricing comparison
Security protocols, server networks, and streaming capabilities compared
Speed tests, privacy policies, and user experience evaluation