Hide.me
- Simultaneous Connections
- Kill Switch
- Split Tunneling
Malaysia-based VPN supporting WireGuard, OpenVPN, IKEv2, SSTP and SoftEther. Suits technical users who value protocol choice over reliable streaming.
Hide.me and Mullvad run on opposite business philosophies and treat their users very differently. Hide.me offers a free way in, with plenty of technical customization. Mullvad is a privacy-first cooperative with…
Malaysia-based VPN supporting WireGuard, OpenVPN, IKEv2, SSTP and SoftEther. Suits technical users who value protocol choice over reliable streaming.
Swedish VPN that signs you up with a random account number and charges a flat 5 euros a month. Suits privacy-first users who can live without streaming.
Hide.me and Mullvad run on opposite business philosophies and treat their users very differently. Hide.me offers a free way in, with plenty of technical customization. Mullvad is a privacy-first cooperative with uncompromising ethical principles.
Only Hide.me has a free tier, with 10GB of data a month and access to 5 server locations. Mullvad has no free tier. Its pricing is consistent and ethical, at €5/month for everyone. Their approaches to privacy could hardly be further apart. Mullvad accepts anonymous cash payments and gives you a random account number. Hide.me uses conventional accounts.
Hide.me offers detailed protocol customization and stealth options. Mullvad concentrates on the WireGuard protocol and a privacy-first architecture. Mullvad is fully transparent and runs its business ethically. Hide.me is a traditional tech company with a free tier.
Neither service is strong at geo-unblocking for streaming, though Hide.me has put more effort into it. Hide.me's apps are easier to use and offer more technical customization. Mullvad's apps are simple and privacy-focused. Using them takes more commitment.
Their value differs completely. Mullvad offers absolute privacy and ethical transparency. Hide.me lets you try before you buy.
| Feature | Hide.me | Mullvad |
|---|---|---|
Ad & Tracker Blocking | ||
Anonymous Payment Methods | ||
Connection Protocols | ||
Custom VPN Protocols | ||
Customer Support Availability | ||
Dedicated IP Option | ||
Encryption Standard | ||
Independent Audits | ||
IPv6 Leak Protection | ||
Kill Switch | ||
Multi-Hop | ||
No-logs Policy | ||
Open Source Apps | ||
RAM-only Servers | ||
Simultaneous Connections | ||
Split Tunneling | ||
Streaming Support | ||
Support Channels | ||
Torrenting Support |
The right pick depends on how much privacy matters to you and on your budget. Choose Hide.me if you want to try before you buy with its generous free tier. It also suits you if you like technical customization and would rather have accessible pricing than strict privacy. Choose Mullvad if privacy is your absolute priority. It is fully transparent and runs its business ethically. You can also pay anonymously. For privacy purists, few services match Mullvad's ethical standards. For budget-conscious users exploring VPNs, Hide.me is easier to get into.

Like a seatbelt, a VPN is easy to forget until you need it. A few quick changes in your VPN app help you avoid the biggest mistakes and make your browsing more private and faster.

Telling the truth can be dangerous. Journalists and activists use VPNs to get around censorship and hide where they are connecting from.

Yes, VPNs are legal in India. Learn the caveats of CERT-In's logging order and how to choose a safe provider for privacy, streaming and compliance in 2025.
A mainstream VPN with a no-logs policy audited five times and bundled security extras. It suits households with several devices and frequent travelers.
Surfshark is a lower-priced VPN with unlimited device connections and a no-logs policy verified twice by Deloitte. It suits households with many devices.
ProtonVPN is a Swiss VPN from the Proton Mail team with open-source apps and a free tier that has no data cap or ads. It suits privacy-first users.
Detailed feature analysis, performance benchmarks, and pricing comparison
Security protocols, server networks, and streaming capabilities compared
Speed tests, privacy policies, and user experience evaluation