Mullvad
- No-logs Policy
- Independent Audits
- Anonymous Payment Methods
Swedish VPN that signs you up with a random account number and charges a flat 5 euros a month. Suits privacy-first users who can live without streaming.
Mullvad and Surfshark are about as far apart as two VPNs get. Mullvad is a privacy-first cooperative with strict ethical standards. Surfshark opened VPN access up to more people with unlimited connections and…
Swedish VPN that signs you up with a random account number and charges a flat 5 euros a month. Suits privacy-first users who can live without streaming.
Surfshark is a lower-priced VPN with unlimited device connections and a no-logs policy verified twice by Deloitte. It suits households with many devices.
Mullvad and Surfshark are about as far apart as two VPNs get. Mullvad is a privacy-first cooperative with strict ethical standards. Surfshark opened VPN access up to more people with unlimited connections and aggressive, family-friendly pricing.
On privacy, Mullvad accepts anonymous cash payments, assigns random account numbers and is fully transparent about how it operates. Surfshark follows conventional business practice with traditional account management. Surfshark allows unlimited simultaneous connections, while Mullvad takes the standard approach.
Mullvad charges exactly €5/month to everyone and plays no promotional games. Surfshark's prices vary, with aggressive discounts on long-term plans. Surfshark's features include CleanWeb ad-blocking, MultiHop double VPN and streaming optimization. Mullvad concentrates on doing core privacy well.
Surfshark is far ahead on streaming, with dedicated geo-unblocking resources. Mullvad doesn't compete there. Surfshark's apps are family-friendly, while Mullvad's technical depth assumes some knowledge of privacy.
Mullvad's business ethics rest on complete transparency and privacy-first operations. Surfshark is a commercial service focused on accessibility and features.
| Feature | Mullvad | Surfshark |
|---|---|---|
Ad & Tracker Blocking | ||
Anonymous Payment Methods | ||
Connection Protocols | ||
Custom VPN Protocols | ||
Customer Support Availability | ||
Dedicated IP Option | ||
Encryption Standard | ||
Independent Audits | ||
IPv6 Leak Protection | ||
Kill Switch | ||
Multi-Hop | ||
No-logs Policy | ||
Open Source Apps | ||
RAM-only Servers | ||
Simultaneous Connections | ||
Split Tunneling | ||
Streaming Support | ||
Support Channels | ||
Torrenting Support |
This comes down to privacy against practicality. Choose Mullvad if privacy is your top priority and you value transparent business practices and anonymous payments. It suits people who don't need streaming or unlimited connections. Choose Surfshark if you have a large household and want unlimited device protection, excellent streaming and family-friendly pricing. Privacy purists will find Mullvad's principles hard to match. Families get far more practical value from Surfshark.

Telling the truth can be dangerous. Journalists and activists use VPNs to get around censorship and hide where they are connecting from.

Remote work is the dream for many professionals: pajamas all day and zero morning traffic. It also puts your online privacy and data security at risk.

Depending on where you are, some parts of the internet are off-limits. Virtual Private Networks (VPNs) get around those blocks. Using one is legal in most countries, with a few notable exceptions.
A mainstream VPN with a no-logs policy audited five times and bundled security extras. It suits households with several devices and frequent travelers.
ProtonVPN is a Swiss VPN from the Proton Mail team with open-source apps and a free tier that has no data cap or ads. It suits privacy-first users.
CyberGhost is a Romania-based VPN with servers sorted by task, such as streaming or torrenting. It suits streaming households who want a simple app.
Detailed feature analysis, performance benchmarks, and pricing comparison
Security protocols, server networks, and streaming capabilities compared
Speed tests, privacy policies, and user experience evaluation