IPVanish
- Simultaneous Connections
- RAM-only Servers
- Custom VPN Protocols
IPVanish is a US-based VPN that runs its own servers and allows unlimited devices on every plan. It suits households and small teams with many devices.
IPVanish and ProtonVPN aim at very different parts of the market. IPVanish concentrates on unlimited device connections and straightforward VPN basics. ProtonVPN was started by privacy advocates and brings Swiss…
IPVanish is a US-based VPN that runs its own servers and allows unlimited devices on every plan. It suits households and small teams with many devices.
ProtonVPN is a Swiss VPN from the Proton Mail team with open-source apps and a free tier that has no data cap or ads. It suits privacy-first users.
IPVanish and ProtonVPN aim at very different parts of the market. IPVanish concentrates on unlimited device connections and straightforward VPN basics. ProtonVPN was started by privacy advocates and brings Swiss engineering and strict security standards.
IPVanish allows unlimited simultaneous connections, while ProtonVPN's device allowance depends on your subscription tier. ProtonVPN has a free plan with unlimited bandwidth (speed-limited) across 3 countries. IPVanish has no free option. On privacy the two are not comparable: ProtonVPN is covered by Swiss privacy laws and offers open-source transparency and Secure Core routing.
ProtonVPN's architecture puts privacy first and follows Swiss engineering standards. IPVanish takes a conventional commercial approach. Its security features are reliable but basic. Both struggle to unblock streaming services consistently, though ProtonVPN has put more effort into it recently.
ProtonVPN's apps are more privacy-focused and more technically transparent. IPVanish's interfaces are straightforward but lack advanced privacy features. Support follows the same split: ProtonVPN's help is privacy-focused while IPVanish's commercial support is more basic.
| Feature | IPVanish | ProtonVPN |
|---|---|---|
Ad & Tracker Blocking | ||
Anonymous Payment Methods | ||
Connection Protocols | ||
Custom VPN Protocols | ||
Customer Support Availability | ||
Dedicated IP Option | ||
Encryption Standard | ||
Independent Audits | ||
IPv6 Leak Protection | ||
Kill Switch | ||
Multi-Hop | ||
No-logs Policy | ||
Open Source Apps | ||
RAM-only Servers | ||
Simultaneous Connections | ||
Split Tunneling | ||
Streaming Support | ||
Support Channels | ||
Torrenting Support |
The choice depends on how many devices you need to cover and how much privacy matters to you. Choose IPVanish if you need unlimited device connections and a straightforward service without advanced privacy features. Choose ProtonVPN if you care about privacy, value Swiss privacy laws and want a strong free tier. It suits people who put security principles ahead of device count. Privacy-conscious users will find ProtonVPN far stronger on principles and security. For large families that care most about device coverage, IPVanish is the more accessible choice.

Telling the truth can be dangerous. Journalists and activists use VPNs to get around censorship and hide where they are connecting from.

Remote work is the dream for many professionals: pajamas all day and zero morning traffic. It also puts your online privacy and data security at risk.

Depending on where you are, some parts of the internet are off-limits. Virtual Private Networks (VPNs) get around those blocks. Using one is legal in most countries, with a few notable exceptions.
A mainstream VPN with a no-logs policy audited five times and bundled security extras. It suits households with several devices and frequent travelers.
Surfshark is a lower-priced VPN with unlimited device connections and a no-logs policy verified twice by Deloitte. It suits households with many devices.
CyberGhost is a Romania-based VPN with servers sorted by task, such as streaming or torrenting. It suits streaming households who want a simple app.
Detailed feature analysis, performance benchmarks, and pricing comparison
Security protocols, server networks, and streaming capabilities compared
Speed tests, privacy policies, and user experience evaluation