Hide.me
- Simultaneous Connections
- Kill Switch
- Split Tunneling
Malaysia-based VPN supporting WireGuard, OpenVPN, IKEv2, SSTP and SoftEther. Suits technical users who value protocol choice over reliable streaming.
Hide.me and Surfshark offer value in different ways, especially for families. Hide.me has a free tier you can make real use of, alongside competitively priced paid plans. Surfshark offers unlimited device connections, a…
Malaysia-based VPN supporting WireGuard, OpenVPN, IKEv2, SSTP and SoftEther. Suits technical users who value protocol choice over reliable streaming.
Surfshark is a lower-priced VPN with unlimited device connections and a no-logs policy verified twice by Deloitte. It suits households with many devices.
Hide.me and Surfshark offer value in different ways, especially for families. Hide.me has a free tier you can make real use of, alongside competitively priced paid plans. Surfshark offers unlimited device connections, a full set of paid features and low prices.
Only Hide.me has a free tier, with 10GB of data a month and access to 5 server locations. Surfshark offers only a 7-day free trial. Surfshark allows unlimited connections, while Hide.me's device limits depend on your plan. Hide.me lets you customize protocols in detail and offers stealth options. Surfshark focuses on user-friendly features such as CleanWeb and MultiHop.
Surfshark is better for streaming. It has dedicated resources for geo-unblocking the major platforms and performs consistently. Hide.me's streaming is improving but inconsistent from one service to the next. Surfshark also builds a more complete set of security options into every plan, while Hide.me's advanced features depend on your subscription tier.
Surfshark has better 24/7 support and more comprehensive help resources. Hide.me's support is decent but more basic. Both are competitively priced, though Surfshark's unlimited connections make it better value for families.
| Feature | Hide.me | Surfshark |
|---|---|---|
Ad & Tracker Blocking | ||
Anonymous Payment Methods | ||
Connection Protocols | ||
Custom VPN Protocols | ||
Customer Support Availability | ||
Dedicated IP Option | ||
Encryption Standard | ||
Independent Audits | ||
IPv6 Leak Protection | ||
Kill Switch | ||
Multi-Hop | ||
No-logs Policy | ||
Open Source Apps | ||
RAM-only Servers | ||
Simultaneous Connections | ||
Split Tunneling | ||
Streaming Support | ||
Support Channels | ||
Torrenting Support |
Your household size and your budget decide this one. Choose Hide.me if you want to try before you buy with its generous free tier. It suits individual users who like technical customization and flexible pricing. Choose Surfshark if you have a large household and want unlimited device protection with excellent streaming and a full feature set. For families who need unlimited connections, Surfshark is the better overall value. For individual users exploring VPNs, Hide.me offers excellent flexibility.

Remote work is the dream for many professionals: pajamas all day and zero morning traffic. It also puts your online privacy and data security at risk.

Depending on where you are, some parts of the internet are off-limits. Virtual Private Networks (VPNs) get around those blocks. Using one is legal in most countries, with a few notable exceptions.

A VPN protects you on public Wi-Fi and lets you reach content from other countries. It also keeps your browsing habits private (*no judgment here*).
A mainstream VPN with a no-logs policy audited five times and bundled security extras. It suits households with several devices and frequent travelers.
ProtonVPN is a Swiss VPN from the Proton Mail team with open-source apps and a free tier that has no data cap or ads. It suits privacy-first users.
CyberGhost is a Romania-based VPN with servers sorted by task, such as streaming or torrenting. It suits streaming households who want a simple app.
Detailed feature analysis, performance benchmarks, and pricing comparison
Security protocols, server networks, and streaming capabilities compared
Speed tests, privacy policies, and user experience evaluation