Private Internet Access
- No-logs Policy
- Simultaneous Connections
- Open Source Apps
Private Internet Access is a US-based VPN that had no user logs to hand over in three court cases. Deloitte audited it in 2025. Suits budget power users.
PIA and IVPN have both earned respect, each through a different kind of transparency. PIA's reputation rests on its court victories. IVPN has built its name on ethical business practices and proactive privacy protection.
Private Internet Access is a US-based VPN that had no user logs to hand over in three court cases. Deloitte audited it in 2025. Suits budget power users.
Gibraltar VPN with open-source apps and yearly Cure53 audits since 2019. Suits privacy-focused users who can accept a small network and patchy streaming.
PIA and IVPN have both earned respect, each through a different kind of transparency. PIA's reputation rests on its court victories. IVPN has built its name on ethical business practices and proactive privacy protection.
PIA has the stronger legal record. Its no-logs policy has been tested in court multiple times and was confirmed each time. IVPN is ethically sound but hasn't faced the same legal scrutiny. It offers anonymous signup and works proactively to prevent abuse. PIA gives you granular customization over encryption and protocols. IVPN sticks to core privacy features and does them exceptionally well.
PIA allows 10 simultaneous connections. IVPN's pricing is tiered by connections (2 or 7 devices). IVPN holds itself to unusually high ethical standards. It proactively removed port forwarding and keeps its operations fully transparent. PIA runs more like a technical service provider.
Neither service prioritizes geo-unblocking for streaming, though PIA has put more effort into it. Both require technical knowledge. PIA gives you more customization options, while IVPN's interfaces are cleaner.
| Feature | Private Internet Access | IVPN |
|---|---|---|
Ad & Tracker Blocking | ||
Anonymous Payment Methods | ||
Connection Protocols | ||
Custom VPN Protocols | ||
Customer Support Availability | ||
Dedicated IP Option | ||
Encryption Standard | ||
Independent Audits | ||
IPv6 Leak Protection | ||
Kill Switch | ||
Multi-Hop | ||
No-logs Policy | ||
Open Source Apps | ||
RAM-only Servers | ||
Simultaneous Connections | ||
Split Tunneling | ||
Streaming Support | ||
Support Channels | ||
Torrenting Support |
Choose based on your technical skill and your privacy priorities. Pick PIA if you're technically inclined and want maximum customization. It suits people who value court-tested transparency and proven legal resilience more than ethical principles. Pick IVPN if you're a privacy purist who values ethical business practices and anonymous signup and prefers a boutique privacy service. Technical users who want legal proof get stronger validation from PIA. Privacy advocates who care about ethics will find IVPN's principles stronger.

The right VPN depends on what you need it for: streaming, privacy, security on public Wi-Fi or speed. This guide explains the features to look for and how the top providers compare.

If you've heard about torrenting but worry about the legal and privacy risks, you're not alone. Torrenting itself is completely legal when you're downloading the right content. Here's how to torrent safely and legally with the best VPN protection, plus legitimate alternatives to sites like EZTV.

A guide to watching geo-blocked international content
A mainstream VPN with a no-logs policy audited five times and bundled security extras. It suits households with several devices and frequent travelers.
Surfshark is a lower-priced VPN with unlimited device connections and a no-logs policy verified twice by Deloitte. It suits households with many devices.
ProtonVPN is a Swiss VPN from the Proton Mail team with open-source apps and a free tier that has no data cap or ads. It suits privacy-first users.
Detailed feature analysis, performance benchmarks, and pricing comparison
Security protocols, server networks, and streaming capabilities compared
Speed tests, privacy policies, and user experience evaluation