Private Internet Access
- No-logs Policy
- Simultaneous Connections
- Open Source Apps
Private Internet Access is a US-based VPN that had no user logs to hand over in three court cases. Deloitte audited it in 2025. Suits budget power users.
PIA and CyberGhost suit users with very different levels of expertise. PIA made its name on court-tested transparency and granular customization. CyberGhost focuses on specialized servers and automatic optimization.
Private Internet Access is a US-based VPN that had no user logs to hand over in three court cases. Deloitte audited it in 2025. Suits budget power users.
CyberGhost is a Romania-based VPN with servers sorted by task, such as streaming or torrenting. It suits streaming households who want a simple app.
PIA and CyberGhost suit users with very different levels of expertise. PIA made its name on court-tested transparency and granular customization. CyberGhost focuses on specialized servers and automatic optimization.
PIA is clearly ahead on legal transparency. Its no-logs policy has been tested in court multiple times and was confirmed each time. CyberGhost is trustworthy but hasn't faced the same legal scrutiny. It offers NoSpy servers run from its Romanian headquarters. CyberGhost's money-back guarantee is 45 days, the longest in the industry. PIA's is the standard 30 days.
Their technical approaches are opposites. PIA gives you granular control over encryption, protocols and connection settings. CyberGhost picks servers automatically and optimizes for beginners. PIA runs over 35,000 servers. CyberGhost's network is smaller, with servers tuned for specific activities.
CyberGhost is better for streaming, with specialized Netflix servers and consistent geo-unblocking. PIA takes a general approach. Its results have improved but are harder to predict. CyberGhost's apps are intuitive. PIA's interface can feel technical and overwhelming to casual users.
| Feature | Private Internet Access | CyberGhost |
|---|---|---|
Ad & Tracker Blocking | ||
Anonymous Payment Methods | ||
Connection Protocols | ||
Custom VPN Protocols | ||
Customer Support Availability | ||
Dedicated IP Option | ||
Encryption Standard | ||
Independent Audits | ||
IPv6 Leak Protection | ||
Kill Switch | ||
Multi-Hop | ||
No-logs Policy | ||
Open Source Apps | ||
RAM-only Servers | ||
Simultaneous Connections | ||
Split Tunneling | ||
Streaming Support | ||
Support Channels | ||
Torrenting Support |
Pick based on your technical skill and what you use a VPN for. Choose PIA if you're technically inclined and want maximum customization. It fits people who value court-tested transparency and proven legal resilience above user-friendly features. Choose CyberGhost if you want beginner-friendly apps with servers set up for streaming and gaming. It also has the longest money-back guarantee. For mainstream users, CyberGhost is more accessible and better tuned. For power users, PIA gives far more technical control.

For plenty of fans, a Premier League weekend, a La Liga match or a Champions League night is a ritual. Geo-blocking can get in the way. Here is how a VPN helps, whether using one is legal and how to set it up.

The right VPN depends on what you need it for: streaming, privacy, security on public Wi-Fi or speed. This guide explains the features to look for and how the top providers compare.

Free VPNs sound great, but they often come with hidden costs. Here is what they can do with your data and which paid plans and trusted free tiers to use instead.
A mainstream VPN with a no-logs policy audited five times and bundled security extras. It suits households with several devices and frequent travelers.
Surfshark is a lower-priced VPN with unlimited device connections and a no-logs policy verified twice by Deloitte. It suits households with many devices.
ProtonVPN is a Swiss VPN from the Proton Mail team with open-source apps and a free tier that has no data cap or ads. It suits privacy-first users.
Detailed feature analysis, performance benchmarks, and pricing comparison
Security protocols, server networks, and streaming capabilities compared
Speed tests, privacy policies, and user experience evaluation